Harcourt Sucks Customer Reviews and Feedback

From Everything.Sucks

Revision as of 02:18, 15 September 2020 by MwBot (talk | contribs) (MWBot)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Harcourt may refer to:


Tell the world why Harcourt sucks!

I certify that this review is based on my own experiece and is my opinion of this person or business. I have not been offered any incentive or payment to write this review.


Enter Code

Educational Consultant/Content Specialist (Former Employee) says

"Stay as far away from HMH as possible. The do not value their employees and no matter how much experience you have within the company, your job is never secure. Living with that threat constantly over your head was horrible. During one recent purge, older employees with many years with the company were let go, except those that had personal friends at the executive level. Cons: Too many to list"

Sales (Former Employee) says

"HMH is a bad company to work for, especially in sales. A bloated executive leadership team is tone deaf to the needs of the field. The restrictions on the sales team from top-down mandates are a chokehold on being able to serve customers and compete with other companies who are not so short sighted. Many hard-working and talented people have left the company because it is not conducive to success. Something is wrong when high quality professionals leave due to the work environment that does not enable success. Cons: See above"

Customer Service Rep (Former Employee) says

"I would never go back nor recommend any one to work in this company. Completely unfair to employees who worked hard for this company only to be fired. While higher ups make 100's of thousands for salary."

Director of Educational Programs (Former Employee) says

"I say that HMH is a company with no loyalty for its employees and given a chance will take advantage of a employee. I wish I could say something favorable about HMH my experience with this company was shaded in negativity. Since I left the company after being kick out I have received not a single card asking about my health. I was honored initially to work for HMH but they push me out at age 57 and could’ve cared less about how I was going to survive"

Warehouse Worker (Former Employee) says

"they work you like a dog. Do not ask to be train to moive up in this place . they will find some way to get you out of there . with out listing to your side"

Product Marketing Manager (Current Employee) says

"Toxic, cutthroat environment. Cons: every aspect of this company is a con"

Senior Design Manager (Former Employee) says

"Work a ton of hours overtime and management doesn't seem to care - we are all in cover thy butt rules as we are all scared of getting fired any day- everyday Cons: management and compensation"

Supply Planner (Former Employee) says

"Horrible company. Horrible management. Communication is minimal from mid, upper and executive level management. And there are SO many levels of management. Horrible benefits, medical is insanely expensive and coverage is lacking, 401(k) match is a joke. Work environment is bitter and cut-throat. This company has been on the decline for over 5 years and has no way to get better. Cons: Everything"

Interviews (Former Employee) says

"Today, I went to a recruitment event. I went because they sent me an email saying that they wanted to interview me. I wasted my whole morning! When it was my turn, the lady looked at my resume and said that I didn't have the required skills... she didn't even ask me any questions, then I asked why did I get the email and her best answer was: "We send the email to everyone.". Also, it was humiliating because the interview was in front of other people and they knew if you didn't pass the first interview, because it was obvious. This is definitely not ethic. Cons: None"

Senior Editor (Former Employee) says

"Some Advice to Senior Management: Did you hear the story of the farmer who almost trained his donkey to work with no food? Every day he fed it less and less, and just when he thought he had finally trained the donkey to work with no food at all, it up and died on him! Give your employees a raise. Cons: the management is lazy, blames their failure on their subordinates, hr is a joke"

Sales Assistant (Former Employee) says

"Objective: Having over twenty five years in customer service, I’m bringing an attitude of a top-notch team player as well as leader. I have excellent organizational skills with the ability to work in a high volume and strict deadline environment. I have the ability to use independent judgment and discretion. Computer skills are best in Word, Excel and Outlook and Internet."

Content Specialist (Former Employee) says

"I was there for 15 years. My first 8 Harcourt years were good. After HM took over, the next 7years were nerve racking. HM was wretched. They harassed you to sell old product and they lied to the employees and the customers."

Workforce Management Assistant/Administrator (Former Employee) says

"The regular workers were not treated well. It was always dark in some places. Didn't have supplies like you needed. Management was not really interested in what people had to say. The workers were afraid to speak up."

Content Specialist (Former Employee) says

"I loved my job with HMH when I first started. In the end, I loved what I did, but did not appreciate being taken advantage of. Traveling 2 -3 nights a week was fine. Traveling from Sunday to late Friday was a bit extreme week after week. Not to mention, there was no compensation for my overtime or weekends. In 1 1/2 months, I worked 5 weekend days (which equals a week's work) without any compensation financially or a day given back. Manager was extremely unprofessional and an embarrassment around customers. Human Resources was involved and upper management and they chose to look the other way. PEOPLE DON'T LEAVE JOBS, THEY LEAVE PEOPLE. It is a shame, because working with teachers was something I really enjoyed."

Customer Service Representative/Call Center (Former Employee) says

"Great co-workers, but company is extremely disorganized and inefficient causing employees to work excessive overtime. Managers are also disorganized and inefficient causing many problems. Management is basically non-existent. Cons: Massive overtime from June through September, managers are inefficient, disorganized."

Educational Sales Representative (Former Employee) says

"The company is top heavy in high salaried management and they continue to let go people who generate revenue (field sales people) and wonder why they are doing so poorly. They recently filed for bankruptcy in order to unload some debt."

Educational Consultant (Former Employee) says

"I worked at a remote site for HMH - Due to lack of management, HMH knows little of what is needed or occurs at a school. Sales are made based on profit and necessary the needs of the school. Once a school figures this out it can be very frustrating for all involved. If your manager is poor then good luck!"

Test Development Specialist (Current Employee) says

"I'm so sorry I took a job with this company. As a full-time salaried employee I am expected to work 60+ hours a week pretty much every week. There are a lot of contractors here, who don't have to work the overtime. That way management doesn't have to pay the contractors overtime pay. There is an atmosphere of fear, mistrust, and disdain amongst all employees towards management and execs. Company "reorganizes" every 6–9 months and there's always layoffs hanging over our heads. Working here means dealing with chaos and miscommunication on a daily basis. Software used to do my job is outdated, doesn't work much of the time, and very unwieldy. Everyone is micromanaged to the extreme. Employees are treated very poorly and management wonders why morale is so low! Spend a ridiculous amount of time filling out spreadsheets to gather metrics for everything we do. Management pushes and pushes employees to meet ridiculous deadlines and doesn't care about quality. We have to work with a lot of overseas vendors which gets very frustrating at times. Only 2 raises in the last 5 years, and that was only 2%. Constantly under the gun to cut costs while corporate execs spent thousands on a trip to the Kentucky Derby. We're talking about flying them out to Kentucky, hotels, meals, and an exclusive suite at the Derby. All on the company dime. For a company that just came out of bankruptcy that's not responsible spending. Cons: constant layoffs, extremely low morale, no career advancement, long hours, lots of stress, micromanagement, metrics"

Test development (Current Employee) says

"If you have noticed that all of the positive reviews here come from temporary contract workers, there is a reason. Being actually embroiled in the company culture teaches you that HMH is a company with no direction. From the mass layoffs to the bankruptcy to the reliance on contract workers to do the majority of the companies work, there is no sense from management that they understand what is going on in educational publishing at the moment, let alone in 3, 5, or 10 years. Cons: You will not be supported, there is no growth potential, and you will probably get several ulcers"

Business Systems (Former Employee) says

"Lack of over mission as the industry migrates from print to digital. Overall people care but the teams work at cross purpose with too many meetings. In addition, key operational leaders are unwilling to change processes which makes upgrading business systems impossible."

Former Employee - Finance Manager says

"I worked at Houghton Mifflin Harcourt full-time Cons: Executive leadership and unable to compete with market"

Former Employee - Director says

"I worked at Houghton Mifflin Harcourt full-time for more than 5 years Cons: Company does not show loyalty to their employee base. Employees are downsized constantly regardless of your tenure, sacrifices and contributions to the company. I have seen employees with many years of contributions downsized with just a few hours notice. They are treated like yesterdays newspaper without even providing the decency of able to say goodbye to colleagues and friends. I found this complete lack of respect to provide dignity for in some cases a lifetime of dedication to the company appalling. Severances and outplacement are just monetary - HMH does not have the understanding of how to attract, retain and grow their number one asset - the employee."

Current Employee - Anonymous Employee says

"I have been working at Houghton Mifflin Harcourt full-time Cons: Managers, Leaders, CEO, CFO, nepotism, hiring friends, behind the 8 ball, lacking in vision, poorly ran, micro managers, so much more. The ship is going down, but nobody told the rest of the group, just waiting on the CEO to get his golden parachute. Restructured the company and let go some of the highest sales people and managers, you only do that if you are trying to tank the company and get out with some scheme."

Former Employee - Anonymous Employee says

"I worked at Houghton Mifflin Harcourt full-time Cons: Poor management and lack of leadership"

Former Employee - Database Administrator says

"I worked at Houghton Mifflin Harcourt full-time for more than 8 years Cons: A Company that does not follow up its talk with a fitting ‘walk’. Heinemann signals its desire for diversity but how, in this climate, do you rationalize no remedial actions for comments uttered? Examples: A manager who once said of a customer whose credit card did not authorize and she refused to try to resolve: “I’m declaring this customer fraudulent. It has to be. He lives in a hut in Nigeria. I looked it up on Google maps” (A hut in Nigeria cannot be a center for education?) A manager complaining of having to supervise her Asian-Indian employee because “I never can understand ‘them’ ”. (No words could justify…) They claim they have investigated and found nothing substantial. I earnestly beg to differ. They know the names."

Former Employee - Implementation Manager says

"I worked at Houghton Mifflin Harcourt full-time for more than 10 years Cons: HMH continues to lay off employees annually. The employees that get laid off are the ones who support the customers. Managers, Directors, VP and higher are safe. It is sad to see so many talented colleagues get laid off. These are the people who directly impact the customers."

Former Employee - Test Development Specialist says

"I worked at Houghton Mifflin Harcourt full-time for more than 8 years Cons: You are still glossing over feedback."

Current Employee - Anonymous Employee says

"I have been working at Houghton Mifflin Harcourt full-time Cons: Bad management driving good people out. They layoff people doing work and protect bad managers."

Former Employee - Sales Enablement Specialist says

"I worked at Houghton Mifflin Harcourt full-time Cons: Overwhelming workload, unclear and ever-changing directives, abusive executive leader finally fired after years of complaints"

Former Employee - Anonymous Employee says

"I worked at Houghton Mifflin Harcourt full-time for more than 5 years Cons: Way too top heavy. The Exec Leader team, who is very highly compensated, is immune to the series of layoffs that they push down the ranks. However, the layoffs are due to the flawed strategies that they put in place. Is their mismanagement not obvious?? Where is the Board?"

Social Media